Historic abuse cases

Historic abuse cases

When the Limitation (Childhood Abuse) (Scotland) Act came into force late in 2017, the three year time limit in which abuse victims could pursue a damages claim was lifted. The new law applies to anyone who suffered abuse on or after 26 September 1964 and allows a claim for damages to be advanced by anyone who was a child under 18 and suffered sexual, physical or emotional abuse.

The erosion of the three year time bar came about as a result of years of campaigning by survivors. While the pursuit of compensation may not be the right road for all survivors, it is estimated that over 2,000 victims of abuse are positively affected by this change in the law and many are already seeking redress from their abusers.

The Act itself provides a wide definition of “abuse”. Abuse includes sexual abuse, physical abuse, neglect and emotional abuse. It is now widely accepted that the previous three year time limit for such cases was completely unrealistic and failed a generation of abused children.

It must be remembered however that the change in the legal time limit does not constitute a green light for those seeking a legal remedy. The victim still requires to prove ‘on balance of probabilities’ that the abuse occurred. Inevitably there will be evidential hurdles, simply because of the passage of time. Important witnesses may be difficult to trace or may have died. Regularly, there will have been no Police Inquiry or conviction. Recovering historical records from an institution or a Local Authority can be a struggle and some important records may have been destroyed. Significant entries may appear in the records of another member of the victim’s family, instead of within their own records. In some instances, the abuser is an individual with no insurance and there is no association or employer against whom fault can be directed.

In short, claiming damages for historical abuse brings with it a number of difficulties. But these problems always existed in such claims. The major difference now is that, where defenders could usually successfully argue a time bar defence, that is no longer the case.

Studies have established that abuse has a silencing effect on an individual. It can take decades to speak to single soul about it. This legal change recognises that and provides potential opportunities for redress to thousands previously facing a closed door.

If you would like to speak in entire confidence to one of our very experienced solicitors about historic abuse, please get in touch with us.

Contact us

  • Email us
  • Call our personal injury claims team free on 0808 560 0872
  • Arrange a callback by using our enquiry form

Allan McDougall

With you every step of the way.

Go back to the previous page

What our clients say

  • I would like to thank Gordon Milligan for making the whole process simple and easy to understand. I was kept informed at every stage of the claim and his guidance was invaluable in settling this claim.
    T.G.
  • Absolutely brilliant service. Caitlin Souter was very professional and efficient. I had never expected such a high settlement and I'm over the moon. Would definitely recommend.
    G.W.
  • Both Jackie Raitt and Lucinda Burns have been outstanding in the way they have handled my injury case.
    M.G.
  • Caitlin Souter handled my personal injury case. She was very, very professional, polite & easy to work with. Would not hesitate to recommend her.
    I.D.

Call free: 0808 560 0872 EmailTwitterFacebook

© Allan McDougall McQueen LLP | Privacy and legal notices

Top